Frodo enters Mordor, and the Eye should be Very Worried 5

Posted by jeff Sunday, June 25, 2006 19:35:00 GMT

recently asked us whether Microsoft should be worried about Rails (I’m paraphrasing here, because I can’t remember the question exactly).

I think most people would have said no. I mean, c’mon – despite it’s momentum, Rails is still a tiny drop in the ocean of web development. There are a ton of ASP.NET developers out there, and lots of companies that will only want their projects done in .NET. Why in the world should Microsoft worry?

Well, we said Yes.

We said Microsoft should be very worried about Rails. I won’t go into all the reasons here – if anyone’s interested I can explain in another post.

But the really funny part, and the purpose of my quick post today, is that when we answered that question earlier this week, we had no idea what David would say at his keynote last night at RailsConf.

Like the Eye that was distracted by looking at enemy armies instead of taking notice of a small (but fatal) ring, Microsoft continues to be distracted by shipping Vista CTP RC2 Beta2, inventing really stupid names for its technology substrates (like the new names that replaced Indigo and Avalon), dividing its next “simple” OS into six or nine different editions (I’ve lost count), and generally missing the mark on every single software development project they’ve started over the past five years.

After hearing David’s keynote and seeing what he’s just committed into the Rails trunk, I hope the Eye continues to be distracted for a long, long time.

Comments

Leave a response

  1. Pascal   June 25, 2006 @ 08:18 PM

    Nice analogy! I liked it.

    Note: the link to David's commit is messed up.

    use this

  2. Jeff   June 25, 2006 @ 08:40 PM

    Thanks Pascal for pointing out the bad link (it's now fixed).

  3. EJC   June 25, 2006 @ 08:57 PM

    ActiveResource ... ?

  4. Brian   June 26, 2006 @ 12:28 AM

    Indeed, ActiveResource is a new library that DHH introduced yesterday here at RailsConf. It gives us the ability to communicate with Rails web services the same way we now communicate with local databases via ActiveRecord. You'll be hearing a lot more about it in the weeks to come.

  5. Peter Krantz   June 26, 2006 @ 05:09 AM

    I agree that Microsoft should be worried. Right now Rails is in the same tier as a lot of ASP.NET applications. That is why I believe that a decent MSSQL-Server driver would make it a lot more easy for companies to move from ASP.NET to Rails. To start with, they could utilize the same MSSQL-Server cluster and server platform they are using today.

Comment


(won't be published)